Chelsea Fontenel vs Michelle Kelly Tikhonko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Nov at 09:54 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Fontenel vs M. Kelly Tikhonko

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fontenel 1 - 0 Tikhonko
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chelsea Fontenel winning 2 and Michelle Kelly Tikhonko winning 0. The last match between Chelsea Fontenel and Michelle Kelly Tikhonko was at the W50 Heraklion, 09-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Chelsea Fontenel getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fontenel | 1 |
| Tikhonko | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W50 Heraklion(11-09-25)
C. Fontenel vs M. K. Tikhonko H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 45.97% (57-67) | Career Total W/L | 33.33% (7-14) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Fontenel vs M. K. Tikhonko Match Preview:
- Second serve performance shows Michelle Kelly Tikhonko slightly ahead, with 43.90% of points won compared to Chelsea Fontenel's 39.60%.
- In returning second serves, Tikhonko edges out Fontenel, winning 45.71% of points to Fontenel's 45.45%.
- For first serve returns, Tikhonko again leads, gaining 37.50% over Fontenel's 34.50% success rate.
- Both players have similar performance under pressure, with Tikhonko saving 48.89% of breakpoints while Fontenel saves 47.83%, indicating competitive in-game resilience.
- Chelsea Fontenel has a stronger year-over-year performance, winning 47.83% of her matches, compared to Tikhonko's 35.00% win rate.
- On surface familiarity, both players have their highest win percentages on indoor hard surfaces, at 48%, but Fontenel has played more matches overall.
- Fontenel has been competing at a higher event level, entering Challengers/ITF tournaments, compared to Tikhonko's Futures/ITF events.
- Fontenel faces stiffer competition with opponents ranked around 362.93, while Tikhonko's competition averages a rank of 80.5.
- In deciding set situations, Fontenel has an advantage, successfully winning 50% compared to Tikhonko's 25% win rate.
Editorial Prediction (November 9, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the upcoming match between Chelsea Fontenel and Michelle Kelly Tikhonko, several performance indicators suggest a competitive contest with Fontenel holding a slight edge. Fontenel's slightly less effective serving statistics are somewhat balanced by her overall match experience and higher competition level.
While Tikhonko has shown marginally superior second serve and break point performance, these advantages may not be enough against the broader strengths Fontenel displays, particularly in matches extending to a deciding set. Fontenel’s ability to secure wins over stronger-ranked opponents also plays into her favor.
Considering the match context, historical performance, and current trends, Chelsea Fontenel appears more likely to come out on top in this contest.
Chelsea Fontenel vs Michelle Kelly Tikhonko Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Fontenel vs M. K. Tikhonko H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0:49:55 | Average Match Time | 0:49:55 |
| 68% (25/37) | 1st Serve % | 73% (27/37) |
| 88% (22/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 58% (7/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (3/10) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (23/37) | Return Points Win % | 22% (8/37) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Fontenel Recent Matches Played
M. K. Tikhonko Recent Matches Played

C. Fontenel vs M. K. Tikhonko Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45.97% (57/67) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (7/14) |
| 46.48% (132/152) | Sets Win/Loss | 36.17% (17/30) |
| 49.12% (1317/1364) | Games Win/Loss | 41.44% (167/236) |
| 46.67% (21/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 41.18% (7/10) |
| 44.64% (25/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 47.83% (11/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 181 | Aces Total | 2 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 249 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:22:31 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 457.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 117.19 |
| 65% (4104/6302) | 1st Serve % | 65% (199/305) |
| 59% (2436/4104) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (91/199) |
| 44% (968/2197) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (46/106) |
| 45% (335/747) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (11/23) |
| 44% (2807/6342) | Return Points Win % | 38% (104/271) |
| 45.63% (47/56) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 47.62% (10/11) | Futures W/L | 38.89% (7/11) |
| 46% (56/121) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 30% (6/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 65% (13/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (20/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 84% (55/46) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (8/7) |
| 15% (55/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (8/1) |
| 14% (69/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (13/0) |